Conversation
Signed-off-by: Rakshithasai123 <rakshithasai2002@gmail.com>
|
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch. 🗂️ Base branches to auto review (1)
Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the ✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
@CodeRabbit, compare the PR with MPL2.0 license text |
|
Tip For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes. 🧩 Analysis chain@reebamosip, I'll compare the MPL-2.0.txt file in this PR with the official Mozilla Public License 2.0 text. 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 16725 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 16725 @reebamosip, I've retrieved both files. Let me perform a detailed comparison to identify any differences. 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 862 @reebamosip, I've completed the comparison. The MPL-2.0.txt file in the PR is almost identical to the official Mozilla Public License 2.0 text, with only two minor differences: Differences Found:
Summary:
The license text itself is accurate and complete. The HTTP vs HTTPS difference is minor, though using HTTPS (as in the official version) is the modern standard. Would you like to update the URL to use HTTPS to match the current official version? |
No description provided.